<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Food Sovereignty: A Strategy for Environmental Justice	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/papers/food-sovereignty-a-strategy-for-environmental-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/papers/food-sovereignty-a-strategy-for-environmental-justice/</link>
	<description>5th November to 15th December 2016</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:32:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Barkin		</title>
		<link>https://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/papers/food-sovereignty-a-strategy-for-environmental-justice/#comment-56</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Barkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=166#comment-56</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One last comment -- if people are still paying attention!  FS has become an important &quot;card&quot; in local political struggles to obtain more public resources to support peasant demands for greater autonomy in the policy arena and on the international fora.  I think the accession by the FAO to the &quot;year of family farming&quot; reflects the growing influence of La Via Campesina globally (even though their push for the &quot;year of peasant farming&quot; was pushed back). The fundamental question faccing us right now is reinforcing the strategies for alternatives to market-based forms of confronting inequality and injustice, problems that in the ultimate analysis emanate from the market itself.

Pace]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last comment &#8212; if people are still paying attention!  FS has become an important &#8220;card&#8221; in local political struggles to obtain more public resources to support peasant demands for greater autonomy in the policy arena and on the international fora.  I think the accession by the FAO to the &#8220;year of family farming&#8221; reflects the growing influence of La Via Campesina globally (even though their push for the &#8220;year of peasant farming&#8221; was pushed back). The fundamental question faccing us right now is reinforcing the strategies for alternatives to market-based forms of confronting inequality and injustice, problems that in the ultimate analysis emanate from the market itself.</p>
<p>Pace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Barkin		</title>
		<link>https://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/papers/food-sovereignty-a-strategy-for-environmental-justice/#comment-30</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Barkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=166#comment-30</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are exactly right -- the problem under the present organziation of antipoverty and official food policies still places many people in the category of &quot;food indigency&quot; --- the emphasis on food sovereignty changes the focus to empowering communities to produce their own foods on a regional basis with markets structured to keep food in the area to satisfy local needs through different market AND non-market structures... This is why so much importance should be accorded the experiences of La Via Campesina as well as the peasant-to-peasant training programs that have proved so valuable.  AN important part of this strategy requires planning to facilitate cooperation with non-food producers (mostly in urban areas) with cooperative exchanges -- I will be exploring this for a book I am currently drafting on &quot;food sovereignty as a strategy for poverty reduction and environmental balance&quot;  I would welcome people with suggestions/case studies to contact me!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are exactly right &#8212; the problem under the present organziation of antipoverty and official food policies still places many people in the category of &#8220;food indigency&#8221; &#8212; the emphasis on food sovereignty changes the focus to empowering communities to produce their own foods on a regional basis with markets structured to keep food in the area to satisfy local needs through different market AND non-market structures&#8230; This is why so much importance should be accorded the experiences of La Via Campesina as well as the peasant-to-peasant training programs that have proved so valuable.  AN important part of this strategy requires planning to facilitate cooperation with non-food producers (mostly in urban areas) with cooperative exchanges &#8212; I will be exploring this for a book I am currently drafting on &#8220;food sovereignty as a strategy for poverty reduction and environmental balance&#8221;  I would welcome people with suggestions/case studies to contact me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Armando Fornazier		</title>
		<link>https://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/papers/food-sovereignty-a-strategy-for-environmental-justice/#comment-25</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armando Fornazier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=166#comment-25</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Professor David Barkin
Many countries (eg some of the African continent, Paraguay, etc) have increased their food production, however, food insecurity rates still remain high. One reason is that people do not have income to buy food and thus, food is exported. In this scenario with liberalized markets, the financialization of agriculture, and large corporations, the distributive question becomes of great importance and not only the Malthusian discussion of production. Regarding this, what could be done to reduce food insecurity?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Professor David Barkin<br />
Many countries (eg some of the African continent, Paraguay, etc) have increased their food production, however, food insecurity rates still remain high. One reason is that people do not have income to buy food and thus, food is exported. In this scenario with liberalized markets, the financialization of agriculture, and large corporations, the distributive question becomes of great importance and not only the Malthusian discussion of production. Regarding this, what could be done to reduce food insecurity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Barkin		</title>
		<link>https://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/papers/food-sovereignty-a-strategy-for-environmental-justice/#comment-21</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Barkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=166#comment-21</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are important discussions that allow us to think that agroecology can make substantial inraods into problems of adequate nutrition -- because of its decentralized nature that can be highly   productive and substantially reduces wastes in the harvest and distrbution systems. The article cited in my contribution by Reganold, J.P. and Wachter, J.M. 2016 suggests that organic agriculture can do it -- and agroecology has much broader and wider appicabilty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are important discussions that allow us to think that agroecology can make substantial inraods into problems of adequate nutrition &#8212; because of its decentralized nature that can be highly   productive and substantially reduces wastes in the harvest and distrbution systems. The article cited in my contribution by Reganold, J.P. and Wachter, J.M. 2016 suggests that organic agriculture can do it &#8212; and agroecology has much broader and wider appicabilty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pedro Abel Vieira		</title>
		<link>https://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/papers/food-sovereignty-a-strategy-for-environmental-justice/#comment-13</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pedro Abel Vieira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=166#comment-13</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Barkin
I agree that food sovereignty is different from food security. I also agree that food sovereignty is a good strategy for environmental justice, but does agroecology have consistent empirical results that can feed the world?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Barkin<br />
I agree that food sovereignty is different from food security. I also agree that food sovereignty is a good strategy for environmental justice, but does agroecology have consistent empirical results that can feed the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
